{"id":1023,"date":"2015-06-07T23:29:33","date_gmt":"2015-06-07T22:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/?p=1023"},"modified":"2015-06-07T23:29:33","modified_gmt":"2015-06-07T22:29:33","slug":"komorni-zamysleni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/komorni-zamysleni\/","title":{"rendered":"Komorn\u00ed zamy\u0161len\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">1992<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Stalo se m\u00f3dou sez\u00f3ny do profesn\u00edch komor r\u00e1zn\u011b tepat. Jedni jsou pro, jin\u00ed proti, jedni cht\u011bj\u00ed povinn\u00e9 \u010dlenstv\u00ed, jin\u00ed dobrovoln\u00e9. K dovr\u0161en\u00ed v\u0161eho zmatku se odborov\u00e1 \u00fast\u0159edna pojmenovala naprosto paradoxn\u011b komorou odborov\u00fdch svaz\u016f. Do toho v\u0161eho l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e1 komora, nejsp\u00ed\u0161 inspirov\u00e1na radik\u00e1ln\u00edmi odbor\u00e1\u0159i, vyhla\u0161uje cosi jako st\u00e1vku, nebo sp\u00ed\u0161e bojkot na obhajobu sv\u00fdch \u00fadajn\u00fdch pr\u00e1v. Do v\u00e1\u0161niv\u00e9 debaty se zapojuje i hlava st\u00e1tu. Smysl cel\u00e9 diskuse se st\u00e1v\u00e1 zcela nepr\u016fhledn\u00fdm.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S pat\u0159i\u010dnou odvahou a v\u00edrou, \u017ee st\u0159\u00edzliv\u00fd odborn\u00fd realismus m\u00e1 nad\u011bji zv\u00edt\u011bzit, pou\u0161t\u00edm se na led, kter\u00fd jest dosti tenk\u00fd. \u00dat\u011bchou mi budi\u017e, \u017ee tak \u010din\u00edm ji\u017e pon\u011bkolik\u00e1t\u00e9 v t\u00e9to v\u011bci a \u017ee stejn\u011b tenk\u00fd byl v dob\u011b schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed prvn\u00edch komorn\u00edch z\u00e1kon\u016f v dob\u00e1ch je\u0161t\u011b revolu\u010dn\u00edch, kter\u00e9 doufejme ji\u017e m\u00e1me za sebou.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kladu si tedy \u0159e\u010dnickou ot\u00e1zku prvn\u00ed:\u00a0<strong>Pro\u010d m\u00e1 v\u016fbec st\u00e1t zapot\u0159eb\u00ed vyd\u00e1vat z\u00e1kon o jak\u00fdchkoli profesn\u00edch komor\u00e1ch? Co\u017epak by nesta\u010dilo oby\u010dejn\u00e9 spol\u010dovac\u00ed pr\u00e1vo?<\/strong>\u00a0Inu, pro zalo\u017een\u00ed dobrovoln\u00e9ho profesn\u00edho sdru\u017een\u00ed by pln\u011b dosta\u010doval institut soukromopr\u00e1vn\u00edho ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho sdru\u017een\u00ed. Probl\u00e9m je, \u017ee takov\u00e1 asociace nen\u00ed partnerem st\u00e1tu, tak\u017ee na n\u00ed tak\u00e9 st\u00e1t nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159en\u00e9st \u010d\u00e1st v\u00fdkonu st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy. Pokud se v\u0161ak nejedn\u00e1 o p\u0159enesen\u00ed v\u00fdkonu st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy, bylo by diskrimina\u010dn\u00edm opat\u0159en\u00edm p\u0159edepisovat n\u011bjak\u00e9mu spolku p\u0159\u00edsn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed pravidla, ne\u017e jak\u00e1 ur\u010duje z\u00e1kon pro jin\u00e1 ob\u010dansk\u00e1 sdru\u017een\u00ed. Zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed z\u00e1kon o z\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed komory mus\u00ed p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee komora je ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed korporac\u00ed. Pr\u00e1v\u011b ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed postaven\u00ed odli\u0161uje komoru od spolku. Toto zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed postaven\u00ed m\u00e1 povahu jednak privilegia, ale tak\u00e9 povahu z\u00e1vazku plnit p\u0159edepsan\u00e9 povinnosti a v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nepln\u011bn\u00ed povinnost p\u0159ijmout z\u00e1konem stanovenou sankci.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kladu si tedy \u0159e\u010dnickou ot\u00e1zku druhou:\u00a0<strong>Pro\u010d st\u00e1t nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159ipustit nepovinn\u00e9 \u010dlenstv\u00ed v komo\u0159e?<\/strong>\u00a0Odpov\u011b\u010f je prost\u00e1: proto\u017ee st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va se mus\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat stejn\u011b na cel\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed st\u00e1tu v\u016f\u010di v\u0161em \u010dlen\u016fm dan\u00e9 skupiny (profese) stejn\u011b. Je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 korporace (sdru\u017een\u00ed) nem\u016f\u017ee cokoli po\u017eadovat od sv\u00fdch ne\u010dlen\u016f. Bylo by to stejn\u011b nesmysln\u00e9, jako o\u010dek\u00e1vat, \u017ee obecn\u011b z\u00e1vazn\u00e1 vyhl\u00e1\u0161ka jedn\u00e9 obce se bude vztahovat na obyvatele obce sousedn\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kladu \u0159e\u010dnickou ot\u00e1zku t\u0159et\u00ed:\u00a0<strong>Je mo\u017en\u00e9, aby komora plnila \u00fakoly sv\u011b\u0159en\u00e9 odbor\u016fm?<\/strong>\u00a0Mo\u017en\u00e9 to jist\u011b v omezen\u00e9 m\u00ed\u0159e je, ale nen\u00ed to zcela spr\u00e1vn\u00e9. Pro odborov\u00e9 sdru\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed plat\u00ed jin\u00e9 z\u00e1kony, jin\u00e1 pr\u00e1va a jin\u00e9 povinnosti. Bylo by osudov\u00fdm omylem pl\u00e9st si odbory s komorou, i kdy\u017e nen\u00ed vylou\u010deno, \u017ee odbory by r\u00e1dy vykon\u00e1valy n\u011bjakou st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu m\u00edsto st\u00e1tu a mo\u017en\u00e1 i ledacos jin\u00e9ho. Z\u00e1kon o\u00a0komo\u0159e by pokud mo\u017eno nem\u011bl povolovat klasick\u00e9 odborov\u00e9 p\u016fsoben\u00ed. Existence ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed komory toti\u017e znemo\u017e\u0148uje faktick\u00e9 fungov\u00e1n\u00ed prav\u00fdch odbor\u016f v dan\u00e9 profesi, tedy obhajobu profesn\u00edch z\u00e1jm\u016f. Komora nem\u00e1 slou\u017eit v prv\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b k obhajob\u011b profesn\u00edch z\u00e1jm\u016f,\u00a0ale k v\u00fdkonu st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy v p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 profesi. Je nemysliteln\u00e9, aby se dostala do rozporu st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va s odpov\u011bdn\u00fdm ministrem, jak se to stalo pr\u00e1v\u011b u l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e9 komory. V takov\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b je povinnost\u00ed ministra t\u0159ebas i s pou\u017eit\u00edm s\u00edly nastolit po\u0159\u00e1dek ve\u00a0st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1v\u011b. V norm\u00e1ln\u00edm pojet\u00ed m\u00e1 ministr mo\u017enost rozpustit neposlu\u0161n\u00e9 org\u00e1ny komory a vyhl\u00e1sit nov\u00e9 volby. O st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1v\u011b se nediskutuje.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">P\u0159enesen\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy na samospr\u00e1vnou komoru (tedy pr\u00e1vn\u011b na ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed korporaci s nucen\u00fdm \u010dlenstv\u00edm na profesn\u00edm principu) je naprosto stejn\u00fdm krokem, jako je p\u0159enesen\u00ed v\u00fdkonu st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy na samospr\u00e1vnou obec (tedy na ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed korporaci s nucen\u00fdm \u010dlenstv\u00edm na \u00fazemn\u00edm principu). Zat\u00edmco u obc\u00ed ji\u017e po p\u011btilet\u00e9 rekonvalescenci c\u00edt\u00edme, \u017ee nepovinn\u00e9 ob\u010danstv\u00ed by bylo nesmyslem stejn\u011b, jako by byla nesmysln\u00e1 dobrovoln\u00e1 st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va, u komor jsme zat\u00edm samostatnou a p\u0159enesenou p\u016fsobnost nep\u0159ijali.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0158e\u010dnick\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka \u010dtvrt\u00e1:\u00a0<strong>Pro\u010d vlastn\u011b st\u00e1t st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu na n\u011bkoho p\u0159en\u00e1\u0161\u00ed, pro\u010d j\u00ed nevykon\u00e1v\u00e1 s\u00e1m?<\/strong>\u00a0To je v\u00fdsostn\u00e9\u00a0pr\u00e1vo st\u00e1tu rozhodnout o tom zda a v jak\u00e9m rozsahu m\u00e1 b\u00fdt st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va p\u0159enesena. Ukazuje se v\u0161ak, \u017ee v n\u011bkter\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech je to levn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. Proto debata o tom, zda st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu maj\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edci \u010di nikoli je logick\u00fd nesmysl, nebo\u0165 v\u017edycky to budou\u00a0\u00fa\u0159edn\u00edci. Rozd\u00edl je v tom, zda to budou \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edci minister\u0161t\u00ed (u n\u00e1s nap\u0159\u00edklad i okresn\u00ed), nebo samospr\u00e1vn\u00ed (obecn\u00ed \u010di komorn\u00ed). V\u017edy to v\u0161ak mus\u00ed b\u00fdt \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edk, kter\u00fd na z\u00e1klad\u011b zmocn\u011bn\u00ed v z\u00e1kon\u011b a v souladu se z\u00e1konem vykon\u00e1v\u00e1 ve stanoven\u00e9m rozsahu st\u00e1tn\u00ed\u00a0spr\u00e1vu. Pozoruhodn\u00e9 je, \u017ee nap\u0159\u00edklad u stavebn\u00edho povolen\u00ed n\u00e1s nijak nep\u0159ekvapuje, \u017ee jej vyd\u00e1v\u00e1 nap\u0159. obecn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edk, kter\u00fd ve zbyl\u00e9m \u010dase pracuje v samostatn\u00e9 p\u016fsobnosti pro obec. V tom je pr\u00e1v\u011b doty\u010dn\u00e1 \u00faspora, \u017ee na m\u00e1lo pr\u00e1ce nejsou v jist\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech\u00a0zapot\u0159eb\u00ed \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edci dva.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0158e\u010dnick\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka p\u00e1t\u00e1:\u00a0<strong>O \u010dem se naopak nediskutuje a m\u011blo by se diskutovat?<\/strong>\u00a0Diskuse m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt vedena o tom, jak rozs\u00e1hlou st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu chceme m\u00edt. V tom se nejsp\u00ed\u0161 budou politick\u00e9 strany r\u016fznit. Pokud se rozhodneme, \u017ee pro n\u00e1s je p\u0159ijateln\u00e9 nevykon\u00e1vat st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu v oblasti nap\u0159. l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e9 p\u00e9\u010de, nen\u00ed nutn\u00e9 m\u00edt \u017e\u00e1dnou st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu a tedy ani \u017e\u00e1dnou komoru. Pouze riskujeme, \u017ee p\u0159i tro\u0161e sm\u016fly natref\u00edme se sv\u00fdm d\u00edt\u011btem na \u0161amana, kter\u00fd p\u0159i operaci slep\u00e9ho st\u0159eva vyoperuje i ledvinu\u00a0a\u00a0tu potom n\u011bkomu prod\u00e1. M\u016f\u017eeme sice potom onoho \u0161amana \u017ealovat, ale ledvinu d\u00edt\u011bti ani kladn\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed soudu nevr\u00e1t\u00ed. Slu\u0161n\u00fd st\u00e1t sv\u00fdm ob\u010dan\u016fm poskytuje garanci, \u017ee psycholog nezp\u016fsob\u00ed \u00fajmu na du\u0161i (t\u011bm co na n\u00ed v\u011b\u0159\u00ed), \u017ee advok\u00e1t nen\u00ed podplacen druhou stranou sporu, \u017ee postaven\u00fd d\u016fm bude m\u00edt p\u0159ijateln\u00e9 estetick\u00e9 i stavebn\u00ed a hygienick\u00e9 kvality. Dohodn\u011bme se tedy v prv\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b na tom, jak siln\u00e9 garance od st\u00e1tu o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1me. Nesta\u010d\u00ed \u0159\u00edci ani velk\u00e9 ani mal\u00e9, mus\u00edme to um\u011bt popsat podrobn\u011bji. Jin\u00fdmi slovy mus\u00edme\u00a0m\u00edt vizi, jak m\u00e1 n\u00e1\u0161 st\u00e1t vypadat. Abych se p\u0159iznal, obecn\u011b \u0159e\u010deno jsem pro st\u00e1t s nep\u0159\u00edli\u0161 velk\u00fdm rozsahem st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy, ale ta zato mus\u00ed b\u00fdt jako \u0159emen.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0158e\u010dnick\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka \u0161est\u00e1 zn\u00ed:\u00a0<strong>Co je tedy v pojet\u00ed st\u00e1tu znamen\u00e1 &#8222;liber\u00e1ln\u00ed&#8220;?<\/strong>\u00a0P\u0159edn\u011b se shodn\u011bme na tom, \u017ee st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va b\u00fdt liber\u00e1ln\u00ed nesm\u00ed. Nerespektov\u00e1n\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy ch\u00e1peme zpravidla jako p\u0159estupek, v hor\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b jako trestn\u00fd \u010din. St\u00e1t naopak liber\u00e1ln\u00ed b\u00fdt m\u016f\u017ee a m\u00e1 b\u00fdt. Liber\u00e1ln\u00ed st\u00e1t m\u016f\u017ee poskytovat dostatek ob\u010dansk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v a svobod, av\u0161ak mysl\u00ed-li to se sv\u00fdmi ob\u010dany dob\u0159e, mus\u00ed db\u00e1t o to, aby byla st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va p\u0159\u00edsn\u00e1 a nestrann\u00e1. Na rozd\u00edl od totalitn\u00edho st\u00e1tu nesm\u00ed br\u00e1t ohled na politick\u00e9 pokyny a mus\u00ed se \u0159\u00eddit v\u00fdhradn\u011b z\u00e1vazn\u00fdmi p\u0159edpisy. Pro ob\u010dana je vcelku jedno, zda st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu vykon\u00e1v\u00e1\u00a0v p\u0159enesen\u00e9 p\u016fsobnosti samospr\u00e1va (komun\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010di profesn\u00ed), nebo st\u00e1tn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edk. Snad n\u011bkter\u00e9 zku\u0161enosti nasv\u011bd\u010duj\u00ed tomu, \u017ee tam, kde je st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va p\u0159enesen\u00e1, se samospr\u00e1va m\u016f\u017ee starat o jak\u00e9si partnerstv\u00ed. Kdybychom si tedy polo\u017eili jako jeden z mo\u017en\u00fdch\u00a0pohled\u016f tento, byla by p\u0159enesen\u00e1 st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va snad o n\u011bco liber\u00e1ln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed za jist\u00fdch okolnost\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ov\u0161em\u017ee ani p\u0159enesen\u00ed p\u016fsobnosti nesn\u00edm\u00e1 ze st\u00e1tu odpov\u011bdnost. To se projevuje pr\u00e1v\u011b ve &#8222;ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vnosti&#8220; korporac\u00ed (sdru\u017een\u00ed), kter\u00e1 maj\u00ed tu \u010dest, \u017ee jsou pov\u011b\u0159eny v\u00fdkonem st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy. St\u00e1t v\u0161ak m\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnost v\u017edy, tak\u017ee si p\u0159irozen\u011b ponech\u00e1v\u00e1 dohled i nad v\u00fdkonem p\u0159enesen\u00e9 st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy. To b\u00fdv\u00e1 nap\u0159\u00edklad zakotveno v pr\u00e1vu st\u00e1tu (vl\u00e1dy, ministra) rozpustit v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nedodr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1konn\u00fdch povinnost\u00ed org\u00e1ny\u00a0komory a vyhl\u00e1sit nov\u00e9 volby. Podobn\u011b to plat\u00ed i o obecn\u00ed samospr\u00e1v\u011b. Proto nem\u016f\u017ee nikdy doj\u00edt k tomu, \u017ee by se st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va postavila proti vl\u00e1d\u011b nebo proti ministrovi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka sedm\u00e1 je tato:\u00a0<strong>&#8222;V tom p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b by ale bylo nutn\u00e9 znovu diskutovat v\u0161echny z\u00e1kony o komor\u00e1ch, kter\u00e9 zat\u00edm m\u00e1me?<\/strong>\u00a0Ano, m\u016f\u017eeme shrnout toto zamy\u0161len\u00ed, \u017ee je t\u0159eba znovu debatovat p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm o pojet\u00ed st\u00e1tu, kter\u00fd budujeme. M\u016f\u017eeme debatovat o na\u0161\u00ed vizi st\u00e1tu, z n\u00ed\u017e se n\u00e1m odvine i rozsah jeho povinnost\u00ed a tedy i rozsah st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy, resp. jej\u00ed hloubka. A\u017e se na tom shodneme, m\u016f\u017eeme pokra\u010dovat v debat\u00e1ch o po\u010dtu stup\u0148\u016f st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy a jej\u00ed organizaci. Nevyhneme se p\u0159i tom mo\u017en\u00e1 diskusi o celkov\u00e9 reform\u011b st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy a jej\u00edm \u00fazemn\u00edm uspo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed. Po tom se m\u016f\u017eeme zam\u011b\u0159it na vytipov\u00e1n\u00ed oblast\u00ed, kde by mohlo b\u00fdt \u00fa\u010deln\u00e9 p\u0159en\u00e9st st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu na korporaci. Zejm\u00e9na tam, kde n\u00e1roky na vzd\u011bl\u00e1n\u00ed neust\u00e1le rostou je pro st\u00e1t velmi obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 neust\u00e1le dohl\u00ed\u017eet na roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed odborn\u00fdch znalost\u00ed. Vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1va je stejn\u011b star\u00e1, jako instituce st\u00e1tu jako takov\u00e9ho, vyhn\u011bme se debat\u011b o povinn\u00e9m \u010di nepovinn\u00e9m \u010dlenstv\u00ed, proto\u017ee to bychom sm\u011b\u0161ovali dv\u011b rozd\u00edln\u00e9 a spolu nesouvisej\u00edc\u00ed v\u011bci &#8211; komoru vykon\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu bychom zam\u011bnili se spolkem. P\u0159i tom je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee komora bez st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy a povinn\u00e9ho \u010dlenstv\u00ed by nebyla komorou, ale spolkem. Pak ale tak\u00e9 nen\u00ed d\u016fvod p\u0159ij\u00edmat nadbyte\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00e1kony, proto\u017ee sta\u010d\u00ed spol\u010dovac\u00ed pr\u00e1vo. Pro\u010d tedy zbyte\u010dn\u011b komplikovat n\u00e1\u0161 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d, kdy\u017e je\u0161t\u011b nav\u00edc by mohl n\u011bkdo polo\u017eit ot\u00e1zku pro\u010d by m\u011bl st\u00e1t\u00a0p\u0159ij\u00edmat pro n\u011bkter\u00fd spolek jin\u00e1 pravidla, a\u0165 u\u017e v\u00fdhodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed nebo m\u00e9n\u011b v\u00fdhodn\u00e1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tedy: jestli liber\u00e1ln\u00ed st\u00e1t, tak sice s malou, ale p\u0159\u00edsnou st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vou. Jestli p\u0159en\u00e9st st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vu na komoru, tak proto\u017ee to je v\u00fdhodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a pak ale s povinn\u00fdm \u010dlenstv\u00edm. Jestli nepovinn\u00e9 \u010dlenstv\u00ed, tak podle spol\u010dovac\u00edho z\u00e1kona. Nesporn\u00e9 je, \u017ee dosavadn\u00ed z\u00e1konn\u00e1 \u00faprava je nevyhovuj\u00edc\u00ed.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1992 Stalo se m\u00f3dou sez\u00f3ny do profesn\u00edch komor r\u00e1zn\u011b tepat. Jedni jsou pro, jin\u00ed proti, jedni cht\u011bj\u00ed povinn\u00e9 \u010dlenstv\u00ed, jin\u00ed dobrovoln\u00e9. K dovr\u0161en\u00ed v\u0161eho zmatku se odborov\u00e1 \u00fast\u0159edna pojmenovala naprosto&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/komorni-zamysleni\/\">\u010c\u00edst v\u00edce &gt;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-clanky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1023"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1024,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1023\/revisions\/1024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.payne.cz\/WP15\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}